| |
|
|

From birth to age five, children learn an astonishing amount about
how the world works. They learn how to speak and understand a
complex language, how objects that disappear from view can still
exist, and how people feel about events in their lives. They are,
as several researchers point out, among the best learners in the
universe (Gopnik, Meltzoff & Kuhl, 1999). So how do they learn?

They grab things, examine them, bang them on the floor, and drop
them. It’s as if they need to discover the world around them. They
will walk or crawl toward fragile items and off-limits places.
When they find a game they enjoy, like peek-a-boo, they want to
play it over and over again (Gopnik et al., 1999).
These activities are all part of a larger learning process.
Scientists call this process hypothesis testing. It’s an extremely
powerful way that young children learn. It’s so powerful, in fact,
that the world’s leading scientists use the same methods. |

To understand hypothesis testing with children, we first must
realize that it always begins with what they already know. What
children already know influences how they think, how they react to
situations, and how they see the world around them. Children learn
by building upon, and then reshaping, what they already know
about
the world (Gopnik et al., 1999).
Based on what they know, children make predictions about what they
think will happen (Gopnik et al., 1999). These predictions are
called hypotheses. When children make predictions about things and
then test their ideas, they are hypothesis testing. Of course,
hypotheses can be right or wrong, and that’s why children—just
like scientists—need to test them over and over again to make sure
they get them right.

- Making observations
- Asking questions
- Creating hypotheses (what they think will happen based on what they know)
- Testing hypotheses
- Evaluating the evidence
|

Peek-a-boo seems like an obvious game to adults. It’s fun to play,
but adults know exactly what’s going to happen. There’s no real
mystery to the game. Nobody’s afraid that the baby might disappear
forever just because she’s out of view.
“Where’s mommy?” “Peek-a-boo!” (baby giggles) “Where’s mommy?”
“Peek-a-boo!” (baby giggles again). Sound familiar? Every parent
and caregiver around the world knows the joy of playing
peek-a-boo. Hiding your faces from a baby, waiting a few precious
moments, and then bursting into view with wide eyes, a big smile,
and a loud “peek-a-boo!” can be delightfully fun. It’s so much
fun, you probably don’t realize that you are part of an ongoing
scientific experiment. This giggling baby is the scientist.

Now let’s look at peek-a-boo from a young child’s point of view.
When an adult hides his face, the baby thinks about the situation
very differently. The adult might really be gone! Peek-a-boo helps
children learn that something can be hidden from view but still
exist in the world. If we slow the game down, it may look
something like this:
- I can’t see Daddy’s face. (making an observation)
- Where did he go? Is daddy still there? (asking a question)
- I’ve played this game before, and I think he’s still there. (creating a hypothesis)
- Let’s see . . . Peek-a-boo! It’s great to see Daddy again! (testing hypothesis)
- I was right. Daddy can hide his face, but I know he’s still here. (evaluating the evidence)
By playing peek-a-boo, children test their ideas about things
that disappear. Over time and with evidence from many games,
children learn that objects still exist even when they’re hidden
from view.

Let’s use a crib mobile method from a well known scientific
experiment as an example of how hypothesis testing might work with
a baby (Rovee-Collier, Sullivan, Enright, Lucas, & Fagan, 1980).
Tyler is three months old, and he loves to watch how things move.
One day, Tyler’s dad gently attached one end of a ribbon to
Tyler’s foot, and the other end of the ribbon to a mobile hanging
above his crib. After a few moments, Tyler discovered that when he
kicked, the mobile moved above him. So he kicked his foot again.
The mobile moved, just like the first time. Soon, Tyler was
kicking all the time—he learned that he could make the mobile move
by kicking his foot. After playing for a short time, Tyler’s dad
removed the ribbon from Tyler’s foot and took the mobile down from
the crib. A few days later, Tyler’s dad did the same thing and
attached one end of a ribbon to the mobile and the other end to
Tyler’s foot.
It was time for Tyler to test a hypothesis. It might have gone
something like this: - I see the mobile.
- Can I make it move?
- I made it move before by kicking, so kicking might make it move again.
- I will kick again.
- It moved! I can make the mobile move by kicking!

Through hypothesis testing, babies like Tyler learn that they can
make things happen. Making mobiles dance is only the first step.
Once babies learn that they can make things happen, they want to
make lots of things happen. One discovery leads to a handful of
new ideas to test.
Hypothesis testing is an active process, and young children are
active learners. By observing, asking questions, making
predictions, and testing their ideas, children make astonishing
discoveries. These discoveries lead to new observations, new
hypotheses, and new tests in an amazing upward spiral of learning.
|
 |
-
Take the time to let children explore, test and learn at their own pace.
- Repetition is an important part of hypothesis testing and learning. Try to enjoy your baby’s explorations, even if it means playing peek-a-boo over and over again.
- Provide lots of opportunities for your baby to explore. Try taking your baby outside to see, touch and feel all sorts
of new things.
- Try to provide a safe environment for discovery. Little explorers will get into everything within their reach.
Scientists need lots of time, good helpers and safe places to
make important new discoveries. Babies need the same
things—and lots of hugs along the way. |
back to top |
|
References:
Gopnik, A., Meltzoff, A. N., & Kuhl, P. K. (1999).
The scientist in the crib: Minds, brains, and how children
learn. New York: William Morrow.
Rovee-Collier, C. K., Sullivan, M. W., Enright, M.,
Lucas, D., & Fagen, J. W. (1980). Reactivation of infant memory.
Science, 208, 1159-1161. |
 |
|

 |
|
 |
|